Validation of Persian Version The Coaching Efficacy Scale-2

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 assisstant professor

2 Assistant professor

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the validity & reliability of Persian Version The Coaching Efficacy Scale-2. For this purpose, 250 men and women Coachs in three skills level from tow filed (team sport and individual) girls were chosen by Purposeful sampling and completed the Scale. At first data was confirmed with use of translation- retranslation, face validity and translation accuracy methods. For scale construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis and for scale's internal constancy and also infraclass correlations coefficient temporal stability, Cranach alpha coefficient was used. The results show that the model fit index (RMSEA, 0.055; CFI, 0.95 & TLI, 0.94), Internal consistency (Motivation 0.85, Game Strategy 0.85, Technique 0.79, Character building 0.85 and Physical conditioning 0.86 and the total scale 0.79) and temporal stability (Motivation 0.81, Game Strategy 0.79, Technique 0.79, Character building 0.83, Physical conditioning 0.78 and the total scale 0.79) showed Persian Version the Coaching Efficacy Scale-2 have good ralibilitay and validity.These findings indicated good validity and reliability for the Persian version of the Coaching Efficacy Scale-2. Therefore, the Persian Version the Coaching Efficacy Scale-2 can be employed as a tool to study and evaluate the Efficacy of Iranian men and women Coachs.

Keywords

References

  1. 1.Hardy, L., J.G. Jones, and D. Gould, Understanding psychological preparation for sport: Theory and practice of elite performers. 1996: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    2.Melbye, L., G. Tenenbaum, and R. Eklund, Self‐objectification and exercise behaviors: The mediating role of social physique anxiety. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 2007. 12(3‐4): p. 196-220.

    3.Bandura, A., et al., Role of Affective Self‐Regulatory Efficacy in Diverse Spheres of Psychosocial Functioning. Child development, 2003. 74(3): p. 769-782.

    4.Chase, J.M., Towards a really unified theory for metacommunities. Functional Ecology, 2005. 19(1): p. 182-186.

    1. Feltz, D.L. and C.D. Lirgg, Self-efficacy beliefs of athletes, teams, and coaches. Handbook of sport psychology, 2001. 2(2) p: 340-361.

    6.Carron, A.V., Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport psychology, 1982.

    7.Manley, J.L. and A.R. Krainer, A rational nomenclature for serine/arginine-rich protein splicing factors (SR proteins). Genes & development, 2010. 24(11): p. 1073-1074.

    8.Myers, G.J., C. Sandler, and T. Badgett, The art of software testing. 2011: John Wiley & Sons.

    9.Kavussanu, M., Moral behaviour in sport: A critical review of the literature. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2008. 1(2): p. 124-138.

    10.Horn, R., Coupled movements in voltage-gated ion channels. The Journal of general physiology, 2002. 120(4): p. 449-453.

    11.Chelladurai, P. and S. Saleh, Preferred leadership in sports. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 1978. 3(2): p. 85-92.

    12.Smith, R.E., F.L. Smoll, and N.P. Barnett, Reduction of children's sport performance anxiety through social support and stress-reduction training for coaches. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 1995. 16(1): p. 125-142.

    13.Gandy, O.H., Communication and race: A structural perspective. 1998: Arnold London.

    14.Vaynberg, M.M., Double circuited refrigeration system with chiller. 1997, Google Patents.

    1. Nikavar, A., et al., Nakysa Hooman.Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMJ), 2002. 60: p. 341-346.

    16.Lintermans, M. and A. Parks, The status of trout cod Maccullochella macquariensis in Bendora Reservoir, ACT: Results of 1992/93 and 1995 monitoring. 1995: Wildlife Research Unit.

    17.Denham, C.H. and J.J. Michael, Teacher Sense of Efficacy: A Definition of the Construct and a Model for Further Research. Educational Research Quarterly, 1981. 6(1): p. 39-63.

    18.Feltz, D., et al., Development of the multidimensional coaching efficacy scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999. 91: p. 765-776.

    19.Vargas-Tonsing, T.M., A.L. Warners, and D.L. Feltz, The predictability of coaching efficacy on team efficacy and player efficacy in volleyball. Journal of Sport Behavior, 2003. 26(4): p. 396-407.

    1. Jowett, S. and V. Chaundy, An Investigation Into the Impact of Coach Leadership and Coach-Athlete Relationship on Group Cohesion. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2004. 8(4): p. 302.

    21.Lee, K., L. Malete, and D. Feltz, The effect of a coaching education program on coaching efficacy. International Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 2002. 14: p. 55-67.

    22.Myers, N.D., E.W. Wolfe, and D.L. Feltz, An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the coaching efficacy scale for coaches from the United States of America. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2005. 9(3): p. 135-160.

    23.Lee, J., Analysis of factors associated with coaching efficacy among New Mexico high school coaches. 2013.

    24.Myers, N.D., et al., The Coaching Efficacy Scale II—High School Teams. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008. 68(6): p. 1059-1076.

    1. Myers, N., D. Feltz, and M. Chase, Proposed Modifications to the Conceptual Model of Coaching Efficacy and Additional Validity Evidence for the Coaching Efficacy Scale II-High School Teams. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 2011. 82(1): p. 79-88.

    26.Kline P. Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. 3nd ed. New York: The Guildford Press; 2011. P. 9-64

    27.Meyers L S, Gamst G, Guarino A J. Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation.2thed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2006. P. 77-83. 

    28.Human H A. Structural equation modeling using LISREL software. 3 ed: Samt:2008. . in persian.

    29.Schutz R W, Gessaroli M E. Use, misuse, and disuse of psychometrics in sport psychology research. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphy, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology.3thed. New York: Macmillan; 1993. P. 901–17. 

    30.Brown T. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research: The Guilford Press. New York. 2006. P .66-71. 

    31.Thomas J R, Nelson J K, Silverman S J. Research methods in physical activity.3thed. Usa: Human Kinetics; 2005. P. 9- 122. 

    32.Zeidabadi R, Rezaie F, Motashareie E. Psychometric Properties and Normalization of Persian Version of Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tools (OMSAT-3). Sport Psychology Review. 2014;3(7):63-82. in persian.

    1. Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal. 1999;6(1):1-55.
    2. Terry P C, Lane A M, Fogarty G. Construct validity of the profile of mood states-a for use with adults. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003; (4): 39- 125. 
    3. Loewenthal K M. An introduction to psychological tests and scales. ­2nd ed. London: UCL Press; 2001. P .51-9.
Journal of Sport Management and Motor Behavior
Volume 16, Issue 31 - Serial Number 31
October 2020
Pages 187-169

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics