The effect of Approach Sandwich Feedback, Success Confirmation Feedback and Error Correction Feedback on the Soccer Kick Accuracy under Environmental constraint

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 .

2 Associate Professor/University of Tehran

3 university of tehran

Abstract

Background& Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate The effect of Success Confirmation Feedback, Error Correction Feedback, and both on the Soccer Kick Accuracy under Open and Closed Conditions. Methodology: For these purpose 45 students 10 to 14 years participated in the study. after the pre-test participant, randomly divided into 3 groups: Success Confirmation Feedback, Error Correction Feedback, and both. In acquisition phase, all groups performed 30 trials and after each trial, they received relevant feedback. the post-test was performed after the last session of acquisition, and retention and transfer tests also were performed after 24 hours.
Results: the results of repeated measures showed that under Open and Closed Conditions the Error Correction Feedback group ,from pre-test to post-test, retention and transfer phase was a significant improvement in their performance (p

Keywords

References

  1.  

    1. Haywood K, Getchell N, 2014 Jul, Life Span Motor Development 6th Edition, )Translation: Hosein Naseri.A),Human Kinetics; 21, 52-46. ) Persian(
    2. Magill RA, 2007, Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications,) Translation: Vaez Mousavi, Shojaee)Third edition New York: McGraw-Hill; pp: 324-320.) Persian(
    3. Schmidt RA, Lee TD, 2005 Feb, Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. ) Translation: Hemayat Talab,Ghasemi.a) Champaign, IL: Human kinetics; pp: 663-631,582-.) Persian(
    4. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. 1984, Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal, Psychological bulletin;95(3):355.
    5. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. 2002, Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 73(4):408-15.
    6. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, 2007,Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport;78(2):40-7.
    7. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Wally R, Borges T, 2009, Knowledge of results after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport;80(3):663-8.
    8. Saemi E, Porter JM, Ghotbi-Varzaneh A, Zarghami M, Maleki F, 2012, Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise.;13(4):378-82.
    9. Badami R, VaezMousavi M, Wulf G, Namazizadeh M. 2001, Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 1;82(2):360-4.
    10. Abbaszadeh, Ali, Taheri, Hamid Reza, Heyrani, Ali; Yousefi, Bahram; 2011, The Effects of Enhanced Feedback (after successful and unsuccessful efforts) on learning and the ability to identify errors in the task of producing power. Journal of Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior. 2 (3) .ps: 110-99. ) Persian(
    11. Munroe-Chandler KJ, Hall CR, Fishburne GJ, Murphy L, Hall ND. 2012, Effects of a cognitive specific imagery intervention on the soccer skill performance of young athletes: Age group comparisons. Psychology of Sport and Exercise.;13(3):324-31.
    12. Gavdini R, saemi E, ashrsfpoornavaee S, abdoli B, 2018, The effect of feedback after good and poor trials on the continuous motor tasks learning: Acta Gymnica, published online ahead of print;10.5507
    13. Becker .KA, 2014,Should feedback confirm success, correct errors, or both? An empirical test of the sandwich approach to delivering feedback: Tennessee;.
    14. Fishbach A, Eyal T, Finkelstein SR, 2010, How positive and negative feedback motivate goal pursuit. Social and Personality Psychology Compass;4(8):517-30.
    15. Edwards WH. 2010 Aug, Motor learning and control: From theory to practice. .) Translation: Heyrani, Jahangiri,Vazini Taher),Cengage Learning; 5 , p. 630-629. ) Persian(
    16. Schwarz, R. (2013, April 19). The “Sandwich Approach” Undermines Your Feedback. HBR Retrieved from http://blogs.hbr.org/2013/04/the-sandwich-approach-undermin/
    17. hayati, A; Farahpour, N; Rahmani, D; 2011,The Effect of Parenting Knee on the Implementation of Soccer Kick Techniques in Teenager's Boys. Sports Medicine Journal, No, 8, pp. 72-63) Persian(
    18. Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC Goodway J 2006, Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults.) Translation: Bahram.A,GHadiri.F,SHahrzad.N). Chapter.;13:267-74. ) Persian(
    19. Football coach of FIFA, 2008 Publications of the World Federation of Football, ) Translation: Taghavi.M) 40-29. )Persian(
    20. Jaberi Moghadam, A A, Makariei, I; Tahmasebi Borujeni; S. Afshari, J, 2012, The Effect of Three Types of Practice (Competitive, Non-Competitive and Combined) on the acquisition and maintenance of open and closed skills. A two-part study on sport management and motor behavior, No. 4, Fall and Winter,. ) Persian(

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics