پیش بینی رفتار نوآورانه کارکنان وزارت ورزش و جوانان از طریق رهبری فراگیر: بررسی نقش میانجی توانمندسازی روانشناختی و امنیت روانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه ارومیه

2 مدیر گروه تربیت بدنی پردیس دانشگاه ارومیه

10.22080/jsmb.2021.16539.3141

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: نوآوری کارکنان سنگ بنای سازمان است و انگیزه رفتارهای نوآورانه کارکنان تا حد زیادی به سبک رهبری بستگی دارد. سبک‌های رهبری سنتی دیگر نمی‌تواند با ویژگی‌های روانشناختی کارکنان، که از مفاهیم، تکنیک‌ها و قوانین اجتماعی جدید استفاده می‌کنند، سازگار شود. هدف از انجام این پژوهش بررسی تأثیر رهبری فراگیر بر رفتار نوآورانه کارکنان با توجه به نقش میانجی توانمندسازی روانشناختی و امنیت روانی در وزارت ورزش و جوانان است.
روش شناسی تحقیق: این پژوهش کاربردی و از نوع توصیفی- پیمایشی است. نمونه‌ی آماری پژوهش برابر با 355 نفر از کارکنان وزارت ورزش و جوانان می‌باشد. برای جمع آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه‌های رهبری فراگیر کارملی و همکاران (2010)، رفتار نوآورانه کارکنان هولمن و همکاران (2012)، امنیت روانی کارملی و همکاران (2010) و توانمندسازی روانشناختی اسپریتزر (1995)، استفاده شد که روایی و پایایی آن‌ها مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. برای بررسی و آزمون فرضیه‌ها از مدل معادلات ساختاری و نرم افزار اسمارت پی.ال.اس استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که رهبری فراگیر بر توانمندسازی روانشناختی، امنیت روانی و رفتار نوآورانه کارکنان اثر مثبت دارد. همچنین توانمندسازی روانشناختی و امنیت روانی بر رفتار نوآورانه کارکنان اثر مثبت داشته و در رابطه بین رهبری فراگیر و رفتار نوآورانه نقش میانجی دارند.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج حاکی از آن است رهبری فراگیر پیش‌بینی کننده مهم رفتار نوآورانه کارکنان است، بنابراین مدیران وزارت ورزش و جوانان می‌توانند با بکارگیری سبک رهبری فراگیر از طریق ایجاد یک فضای امن و افزایش توانمندسازی روانشناختی به توسعه رفتارهای نوآورانه کارکنان کمک کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

مراجع

  1. Ebrahimpour, H., Hoseynnejad, N., Nemati, V., & Taghipour, F. )2015).A survey of the relationship between spiritual intelligence on teacher's innovative behavior. Journal of School Psychology. 4(1), 7-21. ]Persian[
  2. chang, H.T., chou, Y.J., Liou, J.W., & Tu, Y.T. (2016). The effects of perfectionism on innovative behavior and job burnout: Team workplace friendship as a moderator. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 260-265.
  3. Lee, C., & Wong, C.S. (2017). The effect of team emotional intelligence on team process and effectiveness. Journal of Management & Organization, 43, 1-16.
  4. Javed, B., Naqvi, S.M.M.R., Khan, A.K., Arjoon, S., & Tayyeb, H.H. (2017). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. Journal of Management & Organization, 23, 1-20.
  5. Qi, , Liu, B., Wei, X., Hu, Y. (2019). Impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior: Perceived organizational support as a mediator. Plos One 14(2), 1-14.
  6. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive Leadership and Employee Involvement in Creative Tasks in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260.
  7. Choi, S.B., Tran, T.B.H., & Park, B.I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: Mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 12(6), 931-943.
  8. Burke, RJ., Koyuncu, M., Jing, W., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2009). Work engagement among hotel managers in Beijing, China: potential antecedents and consequences. Tourism Review, 64, 4-18.
  9. Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M.A Haque, A., & Rubab, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization, 50, 1-18.
  10. Dulebohn, J.H., Bommer, W.H., Liden, R.C., Brouer, R.L., & Ferris, G.R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759
  11. Altunoglu, A.E., & Gurel, E.B.B. (2015). Effects of leader–member exchange and perceived organizational support on organizational innovation: The case of Denizli Technopark. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 175-181.
  12. Choi, S.B., Tran, T.B.H., & Kang, S.W. (2017). Inclusive leadership and employee well-being: The mediating role of personjob fit. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1877-1901.
  13. Fang, Y.C., Chen, J.Y., Wang, M.J & Chen, C.Y. (2019). The Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Behaviors: The Mediation of Psychological Capital. Psychol, 1-10.
  14. Li, H., Sajjad, N., Wang, Q., Muhammad Ali, A., Khaqan, Z & Amina, SH. (2019). Influence of Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior in Sustainable Organizations: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes. Sustainability, 11, 1-21.
  15. Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412.
  16. Ioannidou, E., Karagiorgos, T., & Alexandris, K. (2016). Exploring the relationship of organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, psychological empowerment and job satisfaction with Leader-Member Exchange of section leaders and team leaders in summer children’s camps in Greece. International Journal of Sport Management, Recreation and Tourism, 22, 63-80.
  17. Sun, L.Y., Zhang, Z., Qi, J., & Chen, Z. X. (2012). Empowerment and creativity: A cross-level investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 55-65.
  18. Alge, B.J., Ballinger, G.A., Tangirala, S., & Oakley, J.L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: Empowering creative and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 221.
  19. Faryad, L., Khorakiyan, A.R., & Nazemi, SH. (2016). Investigating the effect of psychological empowerment on innovative behavior of employees through their work. Journal of Development Evolution Management, 25, 17-26. ]Persian[
  20. Ellen Mathisen, G., Einarsen, S., & Mykletun, R. (2012). Creative leaders promote creative organizations. International Journal of Manpower, 33(4), 367-382.
  21. Gong, Y., Cheung, S.Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J.C. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1611-1633.
  22. Morrison, E.W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
  23. Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K., & Christianson, M. (2009). Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. In J. Greenberg, & M. S. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organizations, 175-202.
  24. West, M.A., & Richter, A.W. (2008). Climates and cultures for innovation and creativity at work. In J. Zhou, & Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 211-236). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  25. Roussin, C.J. (2008). Increasing trust, psychological safety, and team performance through dyadic leadership discovery.Small Group Research, 39(2), 224-248.
  26. Hirak, R., Peng, A.C., Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J.M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 107-117.
  27. Carmeli, A., Sheaffer, Z., Binyamin, G., Reiter‐Palmon, R., & Shimoni, T. (2014). Transformational leadership and creative problem‐solving: The mediating role of psychological safety and reflexivity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 115–135.
  28. Boekhorst, J.A. (2015). The role of authentic leadership in fostering workplace inclusion: A social information processing perspective. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 241–264.
  29. Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461-488.
  30. Zhang, A.Y., Tsui, A.S., & Wang, D.X. (2011). Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 851-862.
  31. Mane, A.S.D. (2019). Establishing Psychological Safety in Teams and the Role of Vulnerability and Inclusive Leadership. Master of Social, Health and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University.
  32. Shams, GH., & Khalijian, S. (2013). The Effect of Secure-Base Leadership Components on the Staff Psychological Safety: the Role of Leadership Effectiveness. Journal of New thoughts on Education, 9(4), 33-53. ]Persian[
  33. Shalley, C.E., & Gilson, L.L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadersh, 15, 33–53.
  34. Heidari, M., Shabanibahar, GH., Erfani, N & Soleymani, M. (2019). The Developing Structural Modeling of an Organizational Innovation Based on the Social Capital Among Youth and Sport Ministry Staffs of Islamic Republic of Iran. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 5(20), 53-64. ]Persian[
  35. Holman, D., Totterdell, P., Axtell, C., Stride, C., Port, R., Svensson, R., & Zibarras, L. (2012). Job design and the employee innovation process: The mediating role of learning strategies. Journal of Business Psychologty, 27(2), 221- 244.
  36. Abasi sfanjani, H. (2017). Designing the model for commercialization of university research using structural equation modeling- partial least squares method (sem-pls). Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 82, 33-65.]Persian[
  37. Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573-579.
  38. Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, A., et al. (2017). Inclusive leadership: realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 28, 190–203.
  39. Ye, Q., Wang, D., & Li, X. (2018). Inclusive leadership and employees’ learning from errors: A moderated mediation model. Australian Journal of Management, 1-20.
  40. Sun, Y., & Huang, J. (2019). Psychological capital and innovative behavior: Mediating effect of psychological safety. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 47(9), e8204.
  41. Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Zhu, Y. (2018). Humble Leadership, Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, and Follower Creativity: A Cross-Level Front. Psychol, 9: 1-9.
  42. Zhang, X., & Zhou, J. (2014). Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Behav. Hum. Decis. 124, 150-164.
  43. Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A & Vracheva, V. (2016). Psychological safety: a meta-analytic review and extension. Pers. Psychol. 70, 113-165.
  44. Dedahanov, A.T., Bozorov, F & Sung, S. (2019). Paternalistic Leadership and Innovative Behavior: Psychological Empowerment as a Mediator. Sustainability Journal, 11, 1-14.
  45. Liu, Y., Wang, W., & Chen D (2019) Linking Ambidextrous Organizational Culture to Innovative Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Psychological Empowerment and Transformational Leadership. Psychol. 10, 2192.
  46. Faraz, A., Mughal, M.F., Ahmed, F., Raza, A & Iqbal, M.K. (2019). The Impact of Servant Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Work Behaviour-Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment. International Journal of Management Science and Business Adminis tration, 5(3), 10-21.
  47. Bhatnagar, J. (2012), Management of innovation: role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 928-951.
  48. Zhou, Q., & Pan, W. (2015). A cross-level examination of the process linking transformational leadership and creativity: The role of psychological safety climate. Human Performance, 28(5), 405-424.

 

 

 

پژوهشنامه مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی
دوره 19، شماره 37
فروردین 1402
صفحه 176-153

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار